Kremmen wrote:
What they obviously fail to realise is that firemen sat in the station doing nothing is a good thing. That means there is no emergency and no one is in trouble. It's the times when they are needed and there are not enough to cope.
Typical short sightedness in my opinion.
And there's the irony. The UK fire service has completely changed the way it is operated in recent years. The National Audit Office has pretty much always praised the fire service as being a good model of public service efficiency, and as a result of new ways of working, the fire service is even more efficient now.
One controversial area is that fire crews have changed the work they do between incidents from 'incident preparedness' (training and inspection of commercial premises) to what is called 'community fire safety' - CFS- (directing their time to prevent fires in homes - where the significant amount of their work comes from. The CFS has been a huge success and call rates are down as a direct result. This low call rate seems to have provided an excuse for the cuts
The Govt do not seem to understand that people need fire crews to arrive in minutes despite how busy they now are. Politicians treat the fire service like a bus company. They think if fewer people are using a bus route, then it should be scrapped. The fire service cannot be seen in such a way.
Yes there is huge swathes of fat than can be cut from London's fire service. Like the Police, they have lots of trained uniform staff sitting behind desks pushing bits of paper around that could be done by admin type staff on a hugely lower salary. They have huge departments that do not directly help in emergencies that should be cut, such as a large equal opportunity dept. Perhaps procurement of kit and uniform could be done by a single UK dept rather than scores of separate fire brigades - the list goes on. There's £millions of savings possible before a single fire engine or station is cut
When you dial 999, you can wait 60 mins for an ambulance (I did last year). You can wait longer for the Met. But you are quite likely to get a fire crew in under 10 minutes - I reckon most people are pleased with this arrangement. Its sad that politicians see this amazing rapid service as 'inefficiency' and seem to be striving for the fire service to join the other exhausted 999 services, which run flat out almost all day with not system of dealing with unexpected demand.
Lastly, the fire service were nearly at breaking point during the London riots, and were stretched during 7/7 and during numerous severe weather events. With more civil unrest, terrorism and poor weather on the horizon, it's important the fire service have spare capacity to cope with high demand periods. This may involved appliances and crews not being always operationally busy 24/7. This is good planning and not inefficiency.