http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28673113





Some anti EU rhetoric in his speech as well concentrating on unskilled immigration from the 27 EU states when we have to turn away skilled immigration from Commonwealth nations to meet quotas.

He is positioning himself for a leadership bid following the next election. Unless Cameron can win outright (the polls suggest unlikely) he is finished and this time next year there will be a new leader of the Tory party.

A Boris in charge of a new EU sceptical Tory party would win a lot of support back from UKIP.

Question is would he command enough votes in the Tory Parliamentary party to be able to win.

I wonder. Are we yet again being lead down the garden path of hope outweighing reality? Cameron turned out to be a Lib-Dem wearing a blue tie, will Boris turn out to be similar once he gets into power? I don't have faith in any of them.

And the announcement the day after Baroness Warsi kicked Cameron in the goolies....

Who would have thunk it?

Rich Kid, When I read your post I agreed that I too have no faith in any of them. But on reflection I have to say that I have 100% faith in their willingness to do everything in their power to make life as difficult, unpleasant, expensive, and as dangerous for ordinary folk as it is possible to do.

As for B.J, I regard him as much a dangerous wolf in disguise as are any of the other possible leaders of the so-called Conservative Party.

There is now NO Conservative Party because none of the potential 'leaders' understands what 'conservative' means any more; as does Labour fail to understand what 'labour' means, as also the Liberals completely misunderstand what it means to be 'liberal'. As for democracy, none of the LibLabCon have the faintest interest in that alien anti-globalist concept. Now if you mention 'elitist dictatorship' to any LibLacCon I suspect their ears will automatically prick up with glee and anticipation..

Boris seems to delight in presenting himself as a harmless buffoon type toff which is pretty much what he is.

Whilst that has obviously served him well thus far as the mayor of London, can anyone honestly see that working well as a potential leader of the CONservative party, and thus potentially a future prime minister representing our country ? What could possibly go wrong ?

The thing that strikes me most about all the current party leaders is that they come across as wet rags with no backbone and no real convictions about anything, let alone any ideas about how to lead.

Moley, I agree with you. I believe they are purposely trained and chosen for those precise 'qualities'. They are in effect, puppets, or 'useful idiots', acting on directives from the globalists, who in turn are following “...the prince of the power of the air...”.

I stumbled across this quiz about the Blundering, Blustering, Buffoon Boris today. I scored 5/10 which is apparently just above average.

Try it for fun and see just how he has performed on some issues since he was elected to lead and represent our fine City.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/sho ... yor-london

Is buffoon Boris closer to Red Ken than the electorate? How will this latest threat from BJ go down with the electorate of Uxbridge?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ution.html

As declaring war on the motorist if it is solely for London

Pie in the eye scheme. How could the tax and fuel duty scheme just apply to London? Suppose you wanted to take your motor to the coast for a day.

Now if he was PM and was promoting a scheme which applied across the Country then it may have some mileage.

I have often said those who do low levels of mileage subsidise those who do high levels, whilst this is addressed partly in fuel tax and duty taxing on the amount used it could make things fairer.

Would depend heavily on how the numbers crunch out though.....

I agree, on the face of it is insane for London to declare a war on the motorist, a war that requires major UK tax changes. But perhaps Boris is preparing us to accept that London is a city state that reports directly to the EU. Now that would make sense of Boris' apparently insane proposals.

A regionalised ex-UK, where each region reports to directly to the EU; it would make sense for London to become a city state of the EU.

I suspect that Boris is really telling us what is going on without actually putting it into words. But isn't that how the New World Order works; they have their secret agenda, but they have to tell us in riddles, without actually saying what they are doing. The truth is so outrageous and preposterous that the schemers are confident we shan't believe what is happening until it is too late – even though it has been in front of our eyes all along.

From the very beginning the whole of the EU project has been one vast confidence trick. We were lulled into a Common Market when the real purpose was, as they kept on telling us – “EVER CLOSER UNION”. “Ever closer union” and “federalism” have been constantly reported for years – but never fully admitted to by the LibLabCon political class, even though all three LibLabCon parties are totally committed to the EU and its regions.