News, views & chat from the people of West London
Hillingdon, 
London Borough, News, Pictures, Chat
truth
MAIN INDEX | PHOTOS | HAYES | UXBRIDGE
+ + Check out the LATEST photos! + + JOIN THE DEBATES + + IT'S GOOD TO TALK! + +
WELCOME

It is currently Mon Oct 05, 2026 6:57 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:06 pm
Posts: 1307
A 2009 report but still Staffordshire.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6535694/Pregnant-woman-reported-to-social-services-over-half-decorated-home.html

Quote:
Mary Cooke invited a policewoman into her house after she had dialled 999 to report a speeding car which nearly hit her outside her home in Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffs.
However, the 27-year-old was left furious after she claims the officer raised concerns with the council’s children’s services department over the state of her property.

Mrs Cooke said she and her husband Peter are redoing the wallpaper at their semi-detached house and that she was “sickened” police had judged her on its appearance.

The first she knew of the officer’s concerns was several days later when she received a letter from Staffordshire County Council expressing fears for the wellbeing of her unborn child.
Mrs Cooke, who is 10 weeks' pregnant with her first baby, said: "The letter made me feel sick.

"I believe someone was judging me for decorating the house and I can't believe it. I'm in the first stages of pregnancy. I'd never dream of bringing a child home to a house being decorated."


You really cannot make this up can you?

I have been reading little into this subject over the last 24 hours or so.

Some of you may be aware that Operation Yewtree has thus far focused on tv celebrities following the Saville expose. There is a wider opinion that this abuse went much deeper and right into the heart of the establishment including politicians some very senior (and an accusation has already been levelled in the house) and senior judiciary.

Some other sources claim there is infighting going on in the Met currently as some of them want to feel some of these persons collars but are being leant on to leave them be.

Bit of a leap here but what if some authorities are using measures like this to appropriate children for nefarious means? Sounds disgusting doesn't it? but then so is the content of the video in post 1 and the known goings on in many children's homes around the UK.

These are FOI requests to Staffordshire council asking about why they take these children and in the main they ignore...

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/newborn_babies_taken_by_social_s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:14 pm
Posts: 659
I only watched 10 minutes of the film and I really want to trust the council officials. I want to believe that there is an issue here so serious that the newborn is at imminent and grave risk of harm.

Then I wondered why on earth was the mum was allowed to bring the baby home from the maternity unit if something was so wrong (assuming it wasn't a home birth)

But most of all I thought of Mark Neary, who you may recall posted on WestLondonChat for a while some time back. His son Stephen who has a learning disability was unlawfully detained by high handed LB Hillingdon officials who said Stephen was a high risk to the community after a minor incident. Some would say that Hillingdon were trying to be first at using a new law, and in their haste, they chose the wrong case, or perhaps it was just incompetence. The result was that Stephen was imprisoned and kept away from his beleaguered and stressed family for a year and the LBH did all they could to frustrate Mark's attempt at seeking justice.

Ok, this is not the removal of a new baby, but the case demonstrates that just because a council says there is a high risk is no guarantee that there is one

A reminder of the case = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18998875


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:09 am
Posts: 463
If you turn the sub titles on that clip of film ... they arent making any sense ??

SOT I remember that case very well. Thankfully his dad won in the end !!!

_________________
I do not suffer fools !!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:06 pm
Posts: 1307
jane wrote:
If you turn the sub titles on that clip of film ... they arent making any sense ??

SOT I remember that case very well. Thankfully his dad won in the end !!!


you tube subtitles are software driven, usually they do not accurately represent what is being said.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:09 am
Posts: 463
Ahhh thanks Geezer ....

_________________
I do not suffer fools !!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:46 am
Posts: 1806
Nigel Cooper - until recently was the senior security consultant for NATO, who has had his daughter stolen by the UK, despite an order from the Hague. Nigel Cooper is no longer a UK national, but a Belgian national.

40 minutes into this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... IgO5PX-8_A Nigel Cooper claims he has 96 digital fingerprints of UK people involved in stealing his daughter, including David Cameron's Office digital signature, and Lord Matthew Thorpe's digital signature (Thorpe's profile: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-j ... -biography ). Nigel Cooper claims that senior members of Parliament, members of the Judiciary, right up to the Lord Chancellor, are involved in this criminal activity of child stealing. Nigel Cooper claims he has now been labelled a terrorist by UK police, MI5 and MI6 -and has had to go into hiding because of death threats.

Nigel Cooper's last words in the video are of a man who means to fight the UK system and force an exposure of the UK's criminality. Nigel Cooper's evidence suggests that the UK authorities are the true terrorists, who are facing some serious international pressure. Let's hope he succeeds before General Election time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:46 am
Posts: 1806
The first 28 minutes of this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... xivHbVVshM are an update on last Thursday's theft of a baby by the Staffordshire SS.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




LOCAL RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS: YOU CAN ADVERTISE TOTALLY FREE OF CHARGE IN OUR ADS SECTIONS!!

ARTICLES WANTED, ARTICLES FOR SALE, PLUMBERS, PIZZAS, ELECTRICIANS, ESTATE AGENTS, ACCOMMODATION WANTED OR FOR RENT, FLATS, ROOMS, HOLIDAYS & TRAVEL, JOBS AGENCIES, TRADESMEN & WOMEN, MOTORS, DRIVING LESSONS, HGV TRAINING, VOLUNTARY GROUPS... JUST REGISTER AND POST YOUR FREE AD, IT'S THAT SIMPLE. NO CATCH! TELL YOUR FRIENDS.

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

London Borough of Hillingdon Chat - Main Index

Christmas music Merelbeke